By joining you will help ensure that we can continue to provide this service
JOIN HERE!
Puzzle - How to Remove Intake Valve Cover
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9065
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Puzzle - How to Remove Intake Valve Cover
had to loosen the solo seat spring so that the rear of the tank could clear the front of the
solo seat. I've got the exhaust (FWD) valve cover off but the intake valve
cover is captive. I can't get it high enough to clear the rocker arm towers and
bolts. It won't go forward because of the valve cover stud for the cover
locking bolt/clamp. It won't spin around any. Of course the frame tube is
blocking it as well.
What's the second code word?? Do I have to lower the engine in the frame?
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
Removal of valve covers on SINGLE
both of my covers rotate, angle, and slip out from under the tank without
loosening anything
a possibility is the center stud is sittiing too high
for the cover to rotate and slip by ??
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9065
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Still Thinking
Don't think so. The clamp across the two halves and the nut holding down the clamp require that the stud be that high. I looked at it more yesterday...I'm stumped.
What about this? Should I double-nut the stud and remove it from the head? Is this something that is to be removed on a frequent and regular basis? On my twins, the stud is something this is quasi-permanent until someone uses too much torque and strips it out.
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9065
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Maybe some pictures will help
The next one shows the cover tilted towards the opposite side as far as it would go.
The last one is from a slightly different angle.
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
damn valve covers
until someone uses too much torque and strips it out."
I think your just not turning and rotating it
enough to reach the take off position - keep trying.
p.s. your spark plug is on the wrong side.
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9065
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Still Stumped
until someone uses too much torque and strips it out."
I think your just not turning and rotating it
enough to reach the take off position - keep trying.
C.D. -
I haven't actually tried to remove the valve cover stud. I was just saying that on my twins, it is something I consider stays in place, generally not to be removed unless absolutely necessary. I feel that I should not have to remove this stud in my case.
Not sure who out there has an R25/2 or R25/3 (which should be the same), but I measured the distance between the top of the head to the underside of the frame backbone and I got 105mm. This is measured from the head itself, not the upraised land that the valve cover gasket sits on. It is measured exactly parallel to the valve cover stud. If someone has a bike with access to do the measuring, maybe they can measure it and let me know what their distance is.
p.s. your spark plug is on the wrong side.
Well, you would be correct if I had an R27!
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
- Bruce Frey
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
I think I remember reading
Does the edge of the cover feel symmetrical? Could there be a flattened area that acts as a "gate"? Just a guess. I knew there was a reason I liked twins!
Bruce
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9065
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Bruce -I'll certainly try
I'll certainly try that. I'm usually pretty good with puzzles, but this one is baffling me. I'll feel like a dope if there's an easy way to do this.
Yeah, this wouldn't be a problem with either of my twins!
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9065
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Another Measurement?
Thanks...
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9065
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Final Answer
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.