If you like our site, please consider joining our club!
By joining you will help ensure that we can continue to provide this service
JOIN HERE!

1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

User avatar
niall4473
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 2:54 pm
Location: U.K.
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: 1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

Post by niall4473 »

The standard flat sump plate is steel, the aftermarket deep ones are usually, but not always, aluminium.
Oil is always cheaper than metal

User avatar
skyler.robbins
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: 1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

Post by skyler.robbins »

Curious.. what size tire is on the front?

808Airhead
Posts: 1301
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:06 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: 1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

Post by 808Airhead »

Going through a break in at the moment on my 58’ R69, and I am doing similar to “Dave79X” & “schraeder’s” advice….. keep revs low but not lugging, and VR -1 Valvoline is a excellent oil for these old ladies. Have fun! Keep it under 10k rpm’s!😳😂
Attachments
5150C8C7-530A-481C-8234-485534AAE1C0.jpeg
8340D915-E5C9-4E63-8EB8-3BF3B258D3B4.jpeg
84215D54-9D86-4123-B86B-D485ECC2BBA3.jpeg
Thomas M.
R69S - R60/2 - R67/2 - R51/3 - R69

Slash2rider
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2023 2:34 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: 1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

Post by Slash2rider »

Daves79x wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:48 am
I've broken in two of these after total rebuilds. An R50 and an R69. I had to be very careful with the R50 as my machinist bored 1st over to only 2 1/2 thou clearance.
Just curious,as far as I know both bikes require 0.05 or 2 thou clearance with modern KS pistons so unless you are using nos Nurals you are about half way to piston slap already.I have both bikes,ridden hard from start,no problems I think piston manufacturers knows better than 50's manual what clearance is required.

Daves79x
Posts: 682
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:13 pm
Location: Knox, PA. USA
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: 1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

Post by Daves79x »

viewtopic.php?p=80906#p80906. This was Vech's take on piston/cylinder clearance. And he did a bunch of them.

Dave
Dave

Slash2rider
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2023 2:34 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: 1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

Post by Slash2rider »

Not surę what is he writing about,on the top of the KS pistons for the r 69,r50r69s three is 0.05 number stamped so 0.002inch Is close enough.0.003 or more depend on applications is right for the Nural pistons in r69 or69s,why make it to loose when no longer needed?

Seek
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:39 am
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: 1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

Post by Seek »

In my R25 I used a KS piston with 0.05 mm clearance. I got a piston seizure at 600 km. Of course, the singles are more vulnerable, cooling is not as good and you tend to run them at full throttle more often. Now it has 0.07 mm clearance and no problem so far.

Slash2rider
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2023 2:34 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: 1965 R50/2 - run-in advice wanted

Post by Slash2rider »

My r25 runs really hot too it did run to lean on factory main jet size,no problems with piston so far.Very quiet engines.

Post Reply