By joining you will help ensure that we can continue to provide this service
JOIN HERE!
U.S. Specs difference?
U.S. Specs difference?
1951 R51/3
1976 R90S
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: U.S. Specs difference?
Under seat and cockpit stickers in different languages, US bikes had front and rear DOT mandated reflectors, the "big pipe" 40 mm exhaust bikes did not come into the US through the dealer network after the 1977 model year, but continued for years later for other countries, and different locations elected to import their own color combinations. Plus ROW and US bikes have their own unique serial numbers. Other countries may have had greater availability of kick starters, and certainly some models were shipped to some countries but not others (late R80G/Ss went to S. Africa for instance, but not elsewhere.)
I think that is all.
President, VBMWO
- srankin
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 8:45 pm
- Location: Spencerport, NY USA
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: U.S. Specs difference?
The R90S in its three year run was the same spec for the US and "the rest of the world".
Engine differences didn't come into play until 77, Then, things got different but by then the R90S was gone. I would think part of its demise was due to the new and stricter US emissions rules coming into play. St.
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9057
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: U.S. Specs difference?
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
- srankin
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 8:45 pm
- Location: Spencerport, NY USA
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: U.S. Specs difference?
I know the DOT had some changes kicking in as well. For example in 78, the headlight always on was mandatory.
There is no denying the pre 78 BMW bikes had the most power and ran the best.
I wonder why the R90S only ran for three years? Was it the cost to build? I would say that is the number one reason.
The R100S bike to follow had cheaper carbs, cheaper paint, but the purchase cost was close to the R90S.
The quality and performance of the R90S cannot be denied, nothing BMW has come out with matches or comes close. The R90S was a bike head and shoulders above anything on the market. The bikes that followed with a few exceptions, became more and more like the other maker's bikes.
Today's BMW is a shadow of the R90S high tech yes, but, not as different in quality tech and performance as the rest of the market. St.
- schrader7032
- Posts: 9057
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: U.S. Specs difference?
I'm sure that "bean counters" were involved in the evolution of the brand. But I suspect that the demand for a larger engine at 1000cc was a wide request from owners. Plus, Hans Muth's newest creation, the R100RS was waiting in the wings. As ground breaking the R90S was, the R100RS sent BMW off in a whole 'nuther direction. For the better? Only in the eyes of the beholder!
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
- srankin
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 8:45 pm
- Location: Spencerport, NY USA
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: U.S. Specs difference?
Bean counters are involved in any project, the problem today is they are too much involved and overshadow what made BMW bikes great. St.