/2 type 120 carb difficulties
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2021 11:13 am
I'm very adept at tuning carbs on R100 series but i'm really struggling for some reason on tuning my R50/2.
It'll tune and run, but i've never been happy/satisfied with it for the last 5k miles since the build.
I'm scratching my head and wondering if i'm applying late 80's tuning expectations to mid-60's designs here and need to adjust my expectations.
Baseline:
re-torqued heads
valve lash set
points are good - harms plate
timing differential resolved (love tap!) and verified with dynamic timing gun
no vacuum leaks
proper carbs full dip & soak rebuild with all new jets, needles, etc., meticulously ensured that jets, mains, needles, etc., are correct for the bike.
Went for an 18 mile ride and then put it on the center stand while running.
When i go after the idle screw and turn it inward to where the engine stumbles, i then turn it outward and both sides take 9.5-10 complete turns to where idle drops down again.
QUESTION 1 - Is this normal? Seems excessive.
I set it to halfway and tightened the lock nut and then tackled the idle setting screw. I like around 1000 rpm or when the gen light just turns off.
My carbs have the brass ports in the flange against the heads for hooking up a manometer. I have a digital one that is very nice.
However, I cannot - CANNOT - get the suction balanced between the 2 sides by adjusting the idle RPM screw (the big round one). Even if i turn the left cylinder way up and the right way down, it still shows the right pulling harder.
QUESTION 2 - is this normal and should i give up on a manometer and just do the shorting method?
So i went with the classic shorting method to move along and got things balanced at idle and then moved on to the throttle cables which is easy but without being able to empirically verify with the manometer, i'm really doing it by feel and smooth turn off idle.
It's subjective and I'm not satisfied with it.
Advice or thoughts welcome.
It'll tune and run, but i've never been happy/satisfied with it for the last 5k miles since the build.
I'm scratching my head and wondering if i'm applying late 80's tuning expectations to mid-60's designs here and need to adjust my expectations.
Baseline:
re-torqued heads
valve lash set
points are good - harms plate
timing differential resolved (love tap!) and verified with dynamic timing gun
no vacuum leaks
proper carbs full dip & soak rebuild with all new jets, needles, etc., meticulously ensured that jets, mains, needles, etc., are correct for the bike.
Went for an 18 mile ride and then put it on the center stand while running.
When i go after the idle screw and turn it inward to where the engine stumbles, i then turn it outward and both sides take 9.5-10 complete turns to where idle drops down again.
QUESTION 1 - Is this normal? Seems excessive.
I set it to halfway and tightened the lock nut and then tackled the idle setting screw. I like around 1000 rpm or when the gen light just turns off.
My carbs have the brass ports in the flange against the heads for hooking up a manometer. I have a digital one that is very nice.
However, I cannot - CANNOT - get the suction balanced between the 2 sides by adjusting the idle RPM screw (the big round one). Even if i turn the left cylinder way up and the right way down, it still shows the right pulling harder.
QUESTION 2 - is this normal and should i give up on a manometer and just do the shorting method?
So i went with the classic shorting method to move along and got things balanced at idle and then moved on to the throttle cables which is easy but without being able to empirically verify with the manometer, i'm really doing it by feel and smooth turn off idle.
It's subjective and I'm not satisfied with it.
Advice or thoughts welcome.