By joining you will help ensure that we can continue to provide this service
JOIN HERE!
Timing advance
Timing advance
Should I retard the timing so the F mark is in the Window at full revs, and not worry about advance at idle? I should note that the bike runs fine and I wouldn't be aware of anything wrong if I hadn't looked.
Barre, MA USA
1963 R60/2 w/ 1955 Steib S500
1973 R75/5
- schrader7032
- Posts: 8895
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Timing advance
Certainly, the timing at full advance is most important. The R69S can't really tolerate being too much advanced as it could harm the pistons...the other bikes might tolerate it some. It would be nice to control where the F-mark stops and then see where the idle mark is. If you can't start the bike because it is not too retarded, then that's not going to work.
The original points system has the ability to change the points gap, change the position when the points open, and has a restriction on how much the advance weights can swing out. The Pentacomm systems needs to have all those features as well I would think.
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:49 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Timing advance
Having said that I have to ask.
Does the bike overheat?
Does the bike sputter and fail to accelerate as it should?
Does the bike run rich and foul spark plugs?
Does the bike run lean and turn the exhaust and spark plugs strange colors?
From the original post it seems the bike runs and performs as it should, so why fix it.
Now to an old quote, "If it ain't broke fix it until it is"
Don't take this as expert advice please, These are simple machines designed for regular maintenance and simple road side repairs.
Re: Timing advance
Too much advance, especially when combined with constant load running, is not good for piston life.
1964 BMW R69S
1968 Triumph T100R road racer
1972 Triumph T150V road racer
2019 BMW S1000R
Re: Timing advance
Like allready mentioned, don't run the bike more advanced then the F point. It's really harsh on the engine. Too much retard at S is not such a problem. But you can also get creative with the machanical advancer. The weights are stopped at some point by a spring. You might be able to bend this spring just enough to limit the advancer.
- vechorik1373
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Timing advance correcting the problem
The simplest cure, if you have the advance with the ? (question mark) shaped limit spring that is screwed to the face plate, is to buy and add a second question mark spring on top of the original one. This will stiffen and strengthen the spring, and you will find that it will stop the advance from going too far at high speed.
Forget attempting to bend the spring to increase the tension. It WILL break when you try it. Double up the spring with a second one, and your R69S (or any of the other models), will not advance too far.
On the late advances, that have the U shaped limit spring, you can do the same thing, and get the same results.
Technical Adviser, Former owner, Bench Mark Works
662 312 2838 cell 9 am to 4pm CST PLEASE!
- schrader7032
- Posts: 8895
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Timing advance
https://www.flyingtpot.com/pentacomm-points-plate
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: Redwood City, CA
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Timing advance
You can set the timing spot on with a timing light and long fallen... It takes a couple of minutes with the front cover over and the engine idling.
- schrader7032
- Posts: 8895
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Timing advance
'78 R100/7 '69 R69S '52 R25/2
Fast. Neat. Average. Friendly. Good. Good.
Re: Timing advance
Attached is a picture of my advance unit. I was not going to try to adjust the stop spring for the reason that Vech gives, but after thinking about it I tried anyway. I was surprised (appalled, really) at how easily it bent under finger pressure and how it held that bend. I put it back in and didn't get the timing where I wanted it. When I took it out again I saw that the pressure of the rotating advancer had pushed the stop spring back where it was in the first place. I that no I should replace the whole unit. This is the one Mike Benoit offers https://vintagebeemerparts.com/new-bmw- ... 8-004-113/ . It looks like a better unit. Does anyone have any experience with it?
Barre, MA USA
1963 R60/2 w/ 1955 Steib S500
1973 R75/5